Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  PAR Preview-Flashback Edition

    Posted 07-16-2015 10:12

     

    PAR Preview ▪ Issue 53

     

    FLASHBACK Edition: 2011

     

    This edition of PAR Preview calls attention to select articles in PAR over the past few years.

    It provides brief summaries of content now available digitally in Wiley's Online Library.

     

    Follow PAR on Twitter (@PAReview) and on Facebook

     

     

    2011 Research Articles

     

    The Obama Administration and PBB: Building on the Legacy of Federal Performance-Informed Budgeting?

     

    Philip G. Joyce (University of Maryland) discusses how the administration of President Barack Obama, like those of his immediate predecessors, is focused on trying to improve the quality of, and use of, performance data. The federal government has been pursuing performance-informed budget reforms for more than 50 years. Most recently, the Bush administration reforms included the President's Management Agenda and the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). The Obama administration reforms include: measuring the effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; reducing or eliminating poorly-performing programs; setting a limited number of short-term, high-priority performance goals; and funding detailed program evaluations. The administration is taking a more agency-driven approach than the Bush administration, but continues to find it challenging to move beyond production of performance data to its use. There should be opportunities to show how performance information can be used for decision making, given the change in the political climate and the needs to reduce spending and the deficit. Historically, there has been little appetite in the Congress for evidence-based decision making. The administration, however, can continue to demonstrate how federal agencies can use performance information to more effectively manage programs. Link to PAR Online Article

     

    Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support

     

    Research on and practical attention for the coproduction of public services is increasing. Coproduction is seen as a way to strengthen the quality and legitimacy of public service and reduce costs. Scholarship on coproduction of public services repeatedly ignores the role of the new media. This is surprising since many proponents highlight its potential for changing traditional, government-centric approaches to delivering public services. Albert Jacob Meijer (Utrecht School of Governance) shows that digital communities form an important addition to the government-centric form of public service provision since they foster both an exchange of experiential information and social-emotional support. Link to PAR Online Article

     

    Implications of Occupational Locus and Focus for Public Service Motivation: Attitudes Toward Work Motives across Nations

     

    Is occupational locus or focus important for public service motivation? Does national context influence public service motivation? To answer both questions, David J. Houston (University of Tennessee) examines attitudes toward work motives from national samples in 11 North American and Western European nations using multilevel binary logistic regression analysis. The findings demonstrate that the locus of an occupation in government and its focus on a public service activity both are important in shaping preferences for work motives related to public service motivation. Also, the preference for work motives held by citizens is correlated with the type of welfare regime in a nation. Although it is less pronounced, some evidence suggests that the type of welfare regime influences preferences toward work motives among government employees. Link to PAR Online Article

     

     

    Public Administration Review is published by Wiley on behalf of the

    American Society for Public Administration.

     

     

    Editor-in-Chief: James L. Perry ▪ Editor: Richard Feiock

     

     

    For any comments or inquiries regarding PAR, please contact us at par@fsu.edu.

     

     

     

     

     

    For Table of Contents (TOC) alerts, please follow the instructions below:

     

    1.    Create an account / sign in to Wiley Online Library.

    2.    Click on "Get New Content Alerts" in the JOURNAL TOOLS menu on the PAR page.

    3.    An e-TOC shows up in your email inbox for each issue!

     

     

     

    _______________________________________________________________________

    To send a message to the list, send your email to SIM@aomlists.pace.edu

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Visit the SIM Division website at: http://sim.aomonline.org _______________________________________________________________________

    If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery options, you can do so online at: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1 _______________________________________________________________________



  • 2.  PAR Preview-Flashback Edition

    Posted 06-16-2017 13:04

    PAR Preview ▪ Issue 85 ▪ June 2017

     

    FLASHBACK Edition

     

    This edition of PAR Preview calls attention to select articles in PAR over the past few years.

    It provides brief summaries of content now available digitally in Wiley's Online Library.

     

    Follow PAR on Twitter (@PAReview) and on Facebook

     

    Stay updated on PAR-related conferences and events.

     

     

    Research Articles

     

    Contemporary Challenges in Local Government: Evolving Roles and Responsibilities, Structures, and Processes

     

    John Nalbandian (University of Kansas), Robert O'Neill Jr. (International City/County Management Association), J. Michael Wilkes (City of Olathe, Kansas), and Amanda Kaufman (City of Marion, Iowa) discuss how three contemporary leadership challenges face local governments today. The first encourages department heads to more actively work the intersection between political and administrative arenas. The second promotes collaborative work, synchronizing city and county boundaries with problems that have no jurisdictional homes. The third argues that citizen engagement is no longer optional-it is imperative-and that connecting engagement initiatives to traditional political values and governing processes is an important mark of successful community building. These three leadership challenges stem from a widening gap between the arenas of politics and administration-that is, between what is politically acceptable in public policy making and what is administratively sustainable. The gap is fueled by conflicting trends experienced locally and common internationally. Failure to bridge this gap between political acceptability and administrative sustainability results in decreasing legitimacy for governing institutions and increasing challenges. Link to PAR Article

     

    Place Marketing as Governance Strategy: An Assessment of Obstacles in Place Marketing and Their Effects on Attracting Target Groups

     

    Place marketing is increasingly being used as a governance strategy for managing perceptions about regions, cities, and towns. What are the most important obstacles to implementing place marketing? Based on a survey of 274 public managers involved in place marketing in the Netherlands, Jasper Eshuis, Erik Braun, and Erik-Hans Klijn (Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands) analyze the main obstacles as perceived by public managers. They also analyze the effects of obstacles on perceived results of place marketing in terms of attracting target groups. A factor analysis of a variety of obstacles investigated in the survey shows three clearly demarcated obstacles: administrative obstacles within municipalities, obstacles in developing the substance of marketing campaigns, and political obstacles. Obstacles in developing the substance of the marketing campaigns have significant effects on the results of place marketing in terms of attracting stakeholders, whereas the two other obstacles have no significant influence. Link to PAR Article

     

    Policy Area as a Potential Moderator of Transparency Effects: An Experiment

     

    Building on the counterintuitive findings of recent empirical studies that transparency in political decision making may have a negative effect on public legitimacy beliefs, Jenny de Fine Licht (University of Gothenburg, Sweden) suggests that transparency has different effects depending on the policy area. Specifically, she argues that transparency is less effective in policy decisions that involve trade-offs related to questions of human life and death or well-being. Using an experiment that involved 1,032 participants, the effect of transparency is tested in two policy areas that represent routine priority setting (culture and leisure) and policy decisions implicitly related to human life and well-being (traffic security). Results indicate that transparency can increase public acceptance of political decisions, but this effect is moderated by the type of policy area. Furthermore, a limited type of transparency in which decision makers provide justifications for their decisions can result in benefits while avoiding potential costs. Link to PAR Article

     

    Social and Political Consequences of Administrative Corruption: A Study of Public Perceptions in Spain

     

    Spain experienced an outbreak of public sector corruption-much of it related to the involvement of regional and local administrators and politicians in the country's urban development boom-that angered the public and sparked calls for government reform. Using data from a 2009 survey that followed these events, Manuel Villoria (King Juan Carlos University, Spain), Gregg G. Van Ryzin, and Cecilia F. Lavena (Rutgers University) examine the association between perceived corruption and the attitudes and behaviors of citizens, including satisfaction with government and democracy, social and institutional trust, and rule-breaking behaviors. The findings suggest that perceptions of administrative as well as political corruption are associated with less satisfaction, lower levels of social and institutional trust, and a greater willingness to break rules. Although these survey results cannot prove causation, they are consistent with the notion that administrative and political corruption damages the legitimacy of government in the eyes of citizens and weakens the social fabric of democratic society. Link to PAR Article

     

    The New Public Service Revisited

     

    The New Public Service describes a set of norms and practices that emphasize democracy and citizenship as the basis for public administration theory and practice. Janet V. Denhardt and Robert B. Denhardt  (University of Southern California) revisit some of the core arguments of the New Public Service and examine how they have been practiced and studied over the past 15 years. They conclude that neither the principles of the New Public Service nor those of the New Public Management have become a dominant paradigm, but the New Public Service, and ideas and practices consistent with its ideals, have become increasingly evident in public administration scholarship and practice. Link to PAR Article

     

    On the Development of Public–Private Partnerships in Transitional Economies: An Explanatory Framework

     

    Yongheng Yang (Tsinghua University, China), Yilin Hou (University of Georgia), and Youqiang Wang (Tsinghua University, China) develop a generic framework to explain the environment for public–private partnership (PPP) development in transitional economies. The framework stands on a tripod that includes the market, the operating environment, and the government, each containing several factors that support aspects of PPPs. The authors apply the framework to analyze the results of a multicountry survey in an effort to identify key factors that facilitate PPP development in transition countries. The identified factors are market potential, institutional guarantee, government credibility, financial accessibility, government capacity, consolidated management, and corruption control. The framework and identified factors may serve as effective tools to diagnose and monitor PPP development in a broader array of countries. The framework is applied in analyzing data from four transitional economies and several advanced economies. The efficacy of the framework is further justified by its explanatory power of PPPs' practicality and is largely confirmed by results from a sensitivity test. Link to PAR Article

     

    Looking for Friends, Fans, and Followers? Social Media Use in Public and Nonprofit Human Services

     

    David A. Campbell, Kristina T. Lambright, and Christopher J. Wells (Binghamton University) use interviews and internet data to examine social media use among nonprofit organizations and county departments involved in the delivery of human services in a six-county area in south-central New York State. Social media use was modest, with nonprofit organizations much more likely to use it than county departments. Organizations used social media primarily to market organizational activities, remain relevant to key constituencies, and raise community awareness. Most organizations either had a narrow view of social media's potential value or lacked a long-term vision. Barriers to use included institutional policies, concerns about the inappropriateness of social media for target audiences, and client confidentiality. Findings build on recent research regarding the extent to which nonprofit organizations and local governments use social media to engage stakeholders. Future research should investigate not only the different ways organizations use social media but also whether organizations use it strategically to advance organizational goals. Link to PAR Article

     

    The Other Type of Performance Information: Nonroutine Feedback, Its Relevance and Use

     

    The literature on performance information use explains how public managers deal with mainly quantitative data that are systematically collected and formally reported. Alexander Kroll (University of Potsdam, Germany) argues that such a narrow understanding is incomplete, as it excludes all kinds of nonroutine performance information, including verbal, ad hoc, and qualitative feedback. To understand how responsive public managers are to performance feedback, alternative sources of performance information need to be taken into account. A literature review suggests considering two important sources of nonroutine feedback: organizational insiders and relevant external stakeholders. Using survey data from German local government, this article shows that public managers prefer to use nonroutine feedback over routine data from performance reports. Furthermore, a regression analysis indicates that different sources of performance information require different determinants to trigger their use. This finding is essential because it suggests that explanations of performance information use can covary with the information source studied. Link to PAR Article

     

    Coproduction and Equity in Public Service Delivery

     

    Public managers and researchers devote much attention to the benefits of coproduction, or the mixing of the productive efforts of public employees and citizens in public service design and delivery. One concern, however, is the distributional consequences of coproduction. Morten Jakobsen and Simon Calmar Andersen (Aarhus University, Denmark) propose that disadvantaged citizens may be constrained by a lack of knowledge or other resources necessary to contribute to and benefit from the coproduction process. From this assumption, they develop the theoretical argument that if coproduction programs were designed to lift constraints on disadvantaged citizens, they might increase both efficiency and equity. This claim is tested using a field experiment on educational services. A coproduction program providing immigrant parents with knowledge and materials useful to their children's early educational development had a substantial positive impact on the educational outcomes of disadvantaged children, thereby diminishing inequity. Economically, the program was more efficient than later compensation of low-performing children. Link to PAR Article

     

    Neoliberalism for the Common Good? Public Value Governance and the Downsizing of Democracy

     

    Adam Dahl and Joe Soss (University of Minnesota) raise a set of cautions regarding public value governance along two dimensions. First, they question the common claim that public value governance poses a direct challenge to the economistic logic of neoliberalism. Second, although public value is often presented as a democratizing agenda, leading works sidestep foundational questions of power and conflict and advance prescriptions that are at odds with important democratic values. Without attending to these problems, the public value concept risks producing a new variant of neoliberal rationality, extending and strengthening the de-democratizing, market-oriented project that its proponents seek to overturn. Link to PAR Article

     

    Networks and Networking: The Public Administrative Agendas

     

    Published in 1997, the article "Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration" outlined the importance of networks for the field of public administration and suggested a series of research agendas that should be pursued. Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. (The University of Georgia; University of Twente, The Netherlands) discusses how that argument has received substantial attention in the years since. Research on networks and networking has made substantial progress, particularly on some questions-the descriptive agenda, for instance, and some aspects of the practical agenda. However, considerable work remains to be done. More needs to be known about the ways in which networks and networking behavior can shape performance and affect the most salient values in our governance systems; better empirical theory is also needed in this regard. Such further developments would be of immense value to the practice of public administration. The world of public administration has for some time been treating networks seriously, but the work is far from complete. Link to PAR Article

     

    Evaluating Urban Public Schools: Parents, Teachers, and State Assessments

     

    Among the most contentious questions in public administration is how the performance of public organizations should be evaluated, and nowhere is this issue more salient than in urban public schools. While significant attention has been devoted to studying administrative measures of public organizations, the views of citizens concerning performance have been widely criticized and are not frequently gathered by schools. How these assessments relate to each other is central to many questions in education policy (e.g., choice, equity) and has important implications for democracy, bureaucratic professionalism, and public performance. This debate can be viewed as focusing on the distinction between convergent validity and discriminant validity. Using data from New York City's public school system with a cross-sectional time-series approach, Nathan Favero and Kenneth J. Meier (Texas A&M University) compare parent and teacher evaluations to government records of schools' characteristics and performance. The findings suggest that parents and teachers are able to conduct intelligent, meaningful evaluations of school quality. Link to PAR Article

     

     

     

    Public Administration Review is published by Wiley on behalf of the

    American Society for Public Administration.

     

     

    Editor in Chief: James L. Perry ▪ Editor: Richard Feiock

     

     

    For any comments or inquiries regarding PAR, please contact us at par@fsu.edu.

     

     

     

     

    For Table of Contents (TOC) alerts, please follow the instructions below:

     

    1.       Create an account / sign in to Wiley Online Library.

    2.      Click on "Get New Content Alerts" in the JOURNAL TOOLS menu on the PAR page.

    3.      An e-TOC shows up in your email inbox for each issue!

     

     

     

     

    _______________________________________________________________________

    To send a message to the list, send your email to SIM@aomlists.pace.edu

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Visit the SIM Division website at: http://sim.aomonline.org _______________________________________________________________________

    If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery options, you can do so online at: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1 _______________________________________________________________________