| The following articles have been published on-line and are now available on the Business and Society website for all subscribers. Abstracts are provided below. Business & Society
OnlineFirst articles for the period 27 March 2015 to 21 April 2015
Article
The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy: A New Resource-Based View Perspective
Charles A. Backman, Alain Verbeke, and Robert A. Schulz
Effective public policy to mitigate climate change footprints should build on data-driven analysis of firm-level strategies. This article's conceptual approach augments the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm and identifies investments in four firm-level resource domains (Governance, Information management, Systems, and Technology [GISTe]) to develop capabilities in climate change impact mitigation. The authors denote the resulting framework as the GISTe model, which frames their analysis and public policy recommendations. This research uses the 2008 Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) database, with high-quality information on firm-level climate change strategies for 552 companies from North America and Europe. In contrast to the widely accepted myth that European firms are performing better than North American ones, the authors find a different result. Many firms, whether European or North American, do not just "talk" about climate change impact mitigation, but actually do "walk the talk." European firms appear to be better than their North American counterparts in "walk I," denoting attention to governance, information management, and systems. But when it comes down to "walk II," meaning actual Technology-related investments, North American firms' performance is equal or superior to that of the European companies. The authors formulate public policy recommendations to accelerate firm-level, sector-level, and cluster-level implementation of climate change strategies.
Article
Embodied Multi-Discursivity: An Aesthetic Process Approach to Sustainable Entrepreneurship
Kim Poldner, Paul Shrivastava, and Oana Branzei
Sustainable entrepreneurship is a vital and growing area of entrepreneurship studies. Although charged with multiple potentially conflicting discourses, sustainable entrepreneurship is usually viewed from a binary logic of business versus sustainability. This article uses an aesthetic process approach to sustainable entrepreneurship to move beyond this binary logic and unearth the tensions between multiple discourses. The authors introduce the construct of embodied multi-discursivity that addresses this issue methodologically as well as conceptually. By combining discourse analysis with aesthetic inquiry, the article pushes the boundaries of "traditional" qualitative methods. The aim is to encourage sustainable entrepreneurship scholars to expand their methodological horizon to capture the emotionally charged, value-laden processes they study. Embodied multi-discursivity shows how multi-discursive processes of entrepreneurship come into being, how they are disrupted, and how they can break into a duality that ignores the variety of discourses. The authors conclude by drawing some implications for sustainable entrepreneurship. | |
| | | Andy Crane, Dirk Matten, Irene Henriques, Bryan Husted
York University
Schulich School of Business
4700 Keele Street, Toronto, M3J 1P3
baseditors@schulich.yorku.ca | | |
_______________________________________________________________________
To send a message to the list, send your email to SIM@aomlists.pace.edu
_______________________________________________________________________
Visit the SIM Division website at: http://sim.aomonline.org _______________________________________________________________________
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery options, you can do so online at: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1 _______________________________________________________________________