Subject: Now online: Volume 23, Number 4 - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly
| | | | Business Ethics Quarterly - Volume 23, Number 4 - 2013 | | Denis G. Arnold | | Sandrine Blanc; Ismael Al-Amoudi Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State - A Rawlsian Perspective This paper re-examines the import of Rawls's theory of justice for private sector institutions in the face of the decline of the welfare state. The argument is based on a Rawlsian conception of justice as the establishment of a basic structure of society that guarantees a fair distribution of primary goods. We propose that the decline of the welfare state witnessed in Western countries over the past forty years prompts a reassessment of the boundaries of the basic structure in order to include additional corporate institutions. A discussion centered on the primary good of self-respect, but extensible to power and prerogatives as well as income and wealth, examines how the legislator should intervene in private sector institutions to counterbalance any unfairness that results from the decline of the welfare state. | | Wayne Eastman Ideology as Rationalization and as Self-Righteousness - Psychology and Law as Paths to Critical Business Ethics Research on political ideology in law and psychology can be fruitfully applied to the question of whether business ethics is ideological, and, if so, what response is warranted. I suggest that legal and psychological research streams can be drawn upon to create a new genre of critical business ethics that differs from normative and empirical business ethics. In psychology, Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) suggests how the mainstream ideology within an academic field can be criticized as a reflection of a self-righteous, us-them mind-set. In law, Critical Legal Studies (CLS) suggests how a field's mainstream ideology can be criticized as a rationalization of the status quo. I suggest that the MFT and CLS criticisms of ideology can be joined to develop a critical approach to business ethics that seriously examines science on normatively charged topics, such as liberal-conservative differences and implicit attitudes, and that frames it in terms of alternative narratives. | | Marek Hudon; Joakim Sandberg The Ethical Crisis in Microfinance - Issues, Findings, and Implications Microfinance is often assumed to be an ethically progressive industry, but in recent years it has been the target of much ethical criticism. Microfinance institutions have been accused of using exploitative lending techniques and charging usurious interest rates; and critics even question the ability of microfinance to alleviate poverty. This article reviews recent research on the microfinance sector that addresses these ethical issues. We show how this research is relevant to a number of theoretical issues, such as how to define poverty, how to understand exploitation, and how to balance financial and social goals in commercial organizations. We conclude by identifying a critical agenda for future research. | | Pete Tashman; Jonathan Raelin Who and What Really Matters to the Firm - Moving Stakeholder Salience beyond Managerial Perceptions We develop the concept of stakeholder salience to account for stakeholders who should matter to the firm, even when managers do not perceive them as important. While managers are responsible for attributing salience to stakeholders, they can overlook or ignore stakeholder importance because of market frictions that affect managerial perceptions or induce opportunism. When this happens, corporate financial and social performance can suffer. Thus, we propose that the perceptions of organizational and societal stakeholders should also codetermine the salience of the focal stakeholder to the firm. We also propose that stakeholder dialogue can reduce the impacts that market frictions can have on managerial perceptions of stakeholder interests that should matter to the firm. Finally, we discuss how the refined conceptualization of stakeholder salience might have better predictive validity, be more normative, and make instrumental and normative stakeholder theory more convergent. | | Lantz Fleming Miller | | Geoff Moore | | Judith Schrempf-Stirling | | Judith Schrempf-Stirling | | Duane Windsor | | | | | | MAILING ADDRESS
Philosophy Documentation Center
P. O. Box 7147
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-7147
DELIVERY ADDRESS
Philosophy Documentation Center
701 Charlton Ave.
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-5203
Phone: 434-220-3300
Toll Free: 800-444-2419 (US & Canada)
Fax: 434-220-3301
E-mail: order [@] pdcnet.org | |
_______________________________________________________________________
To send a message to the list, send your email to SIM@aomlists.pace.edu
_______________________________________________________________________
Visit the SIM Division website at: http://sim.aomonline.org _______________________________________________________________________
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery options, you can do so online at: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1 _______________________________________________________________________