Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [65.120.112.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path:
Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu
X-OriginatorOrg: umb.edu
--_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Friends and colleagues,
Apologies for cross-postings.
John Walker, Jill Kickul and I are excited to invite you to submit a paper =
to a special issue of California Management Review on hybrid organizations =
and social entrepreneurship. We have pasted the call below, and full inform=
ation and submission guidelines can be found here:
http://cmr.berkeley.edu/=
submission_guidelines.html#paper_calls.
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW
CALL FOR PAPERS
Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts and Implications
Guest Editors
Nardia Haigh (corresponding guest editor), University of Massachusetts, Bos=
ton,
Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu<mailto:
Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu>
John Walker, Echoing Green, New York,
John@echoinggreen.org<mailto:John@ech=
oinggreen.org>
Jill Kickul, NYU Stern School of Business, New York,
jkickul@stern.nyu.edu<=
mailto:
jkickul@stern.nyu.edu>
With the market for socially and environmentally conscious consumer product=
s and services growing to almost $300 billion1 and the market for socially =
responsible investments growing to $3 trillion in assets (or 12% of profess=
ionally managed funds) in the U.S. alone,2 there has been complementary gro=
wth in the popularity of hybrid organizations. Hybrid organizations generat=
e income in ways that are more consistent with a for-profit model, but abid=
e by substantial social and ecological missions, which have historically be=
en associated with non-profit models. They have been referred to as Fourth =
Sector, For-Benefit, Values Driven, Mission Driven, Conscious Capitalism, B=
-Corporations, and Social Enterprises.3-5 We use the term "hybrid organizat=
ion" because it reflects the trend of such enterprises to develop business =
models that are a hybrid of what is traditionally considered for-profit and=
non-profit, and because they can exist on either side of the for-profit/no=
n-profit divide (or both sides).6
The growth in the number and impact of hybrid organizations also complement=
s the introduction of new business registration categories that protect exe=
cutives and management from shareholder action demanding that profit be max=
imized and prioritized over mission. In the U.S. alone these categories inc=
lude L3C (Low-profit Limited Liability Company), Benefit LLC, Benefit Corpo=
ration, and Flexible Purpose Corporation. At the time of writing, twelve U.=
S. states had enacted such legislation, and it was proposed in a further fo=
urteen.7 The certification body B-Lab is a key protagonist in this movement=
, as is The American Sustainable Business Council. Since 2008, B-Lab has ce=
rtified 693 "B Corporations," collectively generating $4.2 billion in annua=
l revenue, and operating throughout 60 industries in 24 countries.7 The gro=
wth in hybrid organizations makes them of interest to more traditional for-=
profit companies because they have become competitors and acquisition targe=
ts.8 Hybrids also compete with traditional non-profit organizations, since =
in many cases they can source funding and support from the same foundations=
and agencies, and occupy similar places in the mind of the donating public=
.
Hybrid business models have been termed "sustainability-driven,"6 because t=
heir business models are designed around the alleviation of a particular se=
t of social and/or environmental issues.9 However, they also face significa=
nt challenges surrounding the choice of legal structure, measurement of imp=
act, funding, and scaling up operations.10 Valid questions have also been r=
aised about the sustainability of their models and missions, since there ar=
e examples where hybrids have folded or drifted away from their mission eit=
her through acquisition, leadership changes, or fierce competition from mai=
nstream businesses that maximize profits.5 Other questions inquire about de=
gree to which operating a for-profit business with embedded consciousness c=
ould ever be widely applied or achieve the sustained societal and environme=
ntal transformation for which they strive.5
The goal of this special issue is to stimulate authors to consider the rise=
of hybrid organizations, the ways in which they create and track the share=
d value to which they aspire, and the degree to which these models are sust=
ainable over the long-term. Perhaps more significantly, we aim to offer val=
uable content focusing on the implications (positive and negative) of hybri=
d models for the management of traditional businesses and hence CMR's audie=
nce. To date, only anecdotal evidence has been presented about how hybrids =
have influenced their competitors and industry bodies (e.g., the role Maggi=
e's Organics had in establishing organic fiber processing standards in the =
American apparel industry6). We aim to attract papers based on scholarly st=
udies, and invite submissions that address (but are not limited to) the fol=
lowing topics and suggested research questions:
* Origins and significance of hybrid organizations
o What explains their growth and popularity?
o Are they a force or a fad?
* Strategies of and challenges surrounding hybrid organizations:
o How are hybrid organizations addressing mission drift, scalability, fin=
ancing and other known challenges they face?
o What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing variations of the=
LLC form (e.g., L3C, CIC, and Benefit LLC) or variations of corporate form=
(e.g., Benefit Corporation, flexible purpose corporation) over their origi=
nal forms?
o How do hybrid organizations compare in purpose, strategies and models b=
etween developing and developed markets?
* Measurement of social impact and performance:
o What impact do hybrid organizations have on their focal issues? Are the=
re differences in impact between industries, markets, regions, etc.?
o Do hybrid organizations perform better than their traditional for-profi=
t or non-profit counterparts in terms of social impact and financial perfor=
mance?
o What issues surround the measurement of social impact, and how are they=
overcome?
* Implications of hybrids for management:
o What implications do hybrid organizations carry for the management of t=
raditional for-profit business models?
o What implications do they carry for management in the non-profit sector=
?
o How do traditional companies and non-profits compete with hybrid organi=
zations? For example:
* Are hybrids perceived as a force or a fad?
* To what degree (if any) are traditional companies and non-profits alteri=
ng their strategies or even their models to compete with hybrid organizatio=
ns?
Submission and Deadlines
To submit your manuscript for this special issue, please email your paper t=
o
nardia.haigh@umb.edu<mailto:
nardia.haigh@umb.edu> by 31 October 2013. All=
papers should meet the content and style guidelines of CMR, which can be f=
ound here:
http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidelines.html.
All submissions will be reviewed following CMR's review process. Final deci=
sions about publication will be made by the CMR editor. For further informa=
tion, please contact the CMR co-guest editor for this special issue, Nardia=
Haigh:
nardia.haigh@umb.edu<mailto:
nardia.haigh@umb.edu>.
References
1. LOHAS. 2011. Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability.
http://www.lohas.=
com/about, accessed 29 July 2011.
2. USSIF. 2010. Report: Socially Responsible Investing Assets in US Top $3 =
Trillion; Nearly 1 Out of Every 8 Dollars Under Professional Management. h=
ttp://ussif.org/news/releases/pressrelease.cfm?id=3D168, accessed 12 August=
2011.
3. Alter, K. 2004. Social Enterprise Typology. Seattle, WA: Virtue Ventures=
LLC.
4. Boyd, B., et al. 2009. Hybrid Organizations: New Business Models for Env=
ironmental Leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
5. O'Toole, J. and D. Vogel. 2011. Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capi=
talism, California Management Review, 53/3: 60-76.
6. Hoffman, A.J., K.K. Badiane, and N. Haigh. 2012. Hybrid Organizations as=
Agents of Positive Social Change: Bridging the For-Profit & Non-Profit Div=
ide, in Using a Positive Lens to Explore Social Change and Organizations: B=
uilding a Theoretical and Research Foundation, K. Golden-Biddle and J. Dutt=
on, Editors, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
7. B-Lab. 2012. Annual Report and website.
http://bcorporation.net/, acces=
sed 3 July 2012.
8. Haigh, N. and A.J. Hoffman. 2012. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter=
of sustainable business, Organizational Dynamics, 41: 126-134.
9. Nielsen, C. and P.M. Samia. 2008. Understanding key factors in social en=
terprise development of the BOP: a systems approach applied to case studies=
in the Philippines, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25/7: 446-454.
10. Battilana, J., et al. 2012. In Search of the Hybrid Ideal, in Stanford =
Social Innovation Review: Stanford, United States, Stanford. p. 51-55.
Have a fabulous summer.
Nardia
________________________
Nardia Haigh, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
College of Management
University of Massachusetts Boston
100 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
Office 215, 5th Floor McCormack Building
Ph: +1 (617) 287 7731
--_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
1">
Friends and colleagues,<=
o:p>
=
Apologies for cross-post=
ings.
=
John Walker, Jill Kickul=
and I are excited to invite you to submit a paper to a special issue of Ca=
lifornia Management Review on hybrid organizations and social entrepreneurs=
hip. We have pasted the call below,
and full information and submission guidelines can be found here:
=3D"http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidelines.html#paper_calls" target=
=3D"_blank">
http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidelines.h=
tml#paper_calls.
=
olor:black">CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW=
olor:black">CALL FOR PAPERS
span>
<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Str=
ategies, Impacts and Implications
Guest Editors<=
/u>
lack">Nardia Haigh (corresponding gu=
est editor), University of Massachusetts, Boston,
lor:black">Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu
lack">John Walker, Echoing Green, Ne=
w York,
olor:black">John@echoinggreen.org
lack">Jill Kickul, NYU Stern School =
of Business, New York,
olor:black">jkickul@stern.nyu.edu
k">
With the market for soci=
ally and environmentally conscious consumer products and services growing t=
o almost $300 billion
>1
and the market for socially responsible investments growing to $3 trillion=
in assets (or 12% of professionally managed funds) in the U.S. alone,
ef=3D"#_ENREF_2" title=3D"USSIF, 2010 #2753">
k;text-decoration:none">2
there has been complementary growth in the popularity of hybrid organizati=
ons. Hybrid organizations generate income in ways that are more consistent =
with a for-profit model, but abide by substantial social and ecological mis=
sions, which have historically been
associated with non-profit models. They have been referred to as Fourth Se=
ctor, For-Benefit, Values Driven, Mission Driven, Conscious Capitalism, B-C=
orporations, and Social Enterprises.
004 #2499">3-5=
We use the term “hybrid organization” because it reflects the =
trend of such enterprises to develop business models that are a hybrid of w=
hat is traditionally considered for-profit and non-profit, and because they=
can exist on either side of the for-profit/non-profit
divide (or both sides).
>6
=
The growth in the number=
and impact of hybrid organizations also complements the introduction of ne=
w business registration categories that protect executives and management f=
rom shareholder action demanding that
profit be maximized and prioritized over mission. In the U.S. alone these =
categories include L3C (Low-profit Limited Liability Company), Benefit LLC,=
Benefit Corporation, and Flexible Purpose Corporation. At the time of writ=
ing, twelve U.S. states had enacted
such legislation, and it was proposed in a further fourteen.
NREF_7" title=3D"B-Lab, 2012 #2749">
coration:none">7 The certification body B-Lab is a key pro=
tagonist in this movement, as is The American
Sustainable Business Council. Since 2008, B-Lab has certified 693 “B=
Corporations,” collectively generating $4.2 billion in annual revenu=
e, and operating throughout 60 industries in 24 countries.
F_7" title=3D"B-Lab, 2012 #2749">
ation:none">7
The growth in hybrid organizations makes them of interest to more traditio=
nal for-profit companies because they have become competitors and acquisiti=
on targets.
le=3D"color:black;text-decoration:none">8
Hybrids also compete with traditional non-profit organizations, since in m=
any cases they can source funding and support from the same foundations and=
agencies, and occupy similar places in the mind of the donating public.
=
Hybrid business models h=
ave been termed “sustainability-driven,”
itle=3D"Hoffman, 2012 #2597">
n:none">6 because their business models
are designed around the alleviation of a particular set of social and/or e=
nvironmental issues.<su=
p>9 Howev=
er, they also face significant challenges
surrounding the choice of legal structure, measurement of impact, funding,=
and scaling up operations.
#3030">10
> Valid questions have also been raised
about the sustainability of their models and missions, since there are exa=
mples where hybrids have folded or drifted away from their mission either t=
hrough acquisition, leadership changes, or fierce competition from mainstre=
am businesses that maximize profits.
2011 #3029">5=
Other questions inquire about degree to which operating a for-profit busin=
ess with embedded consciousness could ever be widely applied or achieve the=
sustained societal and environmental transformation for which they strive.=
or:black;text-decoration:none">5
=
rmal">
;color:black">The goal of this special issue is to stimulate authors to con=
sider the rise of hybrid organizations, the ways in which
they create and track the shared value to which they aspire, and the degre=
e to which these models are sustainable over the long-term. Perhaps more si=
gnificantly, we aim to offer valuable content focusing on the implications =
(positive and negative) of hybrid
models for the management of traditional businesses and hence CMR’s =
audience. To date, only anecdotal evidence has been presented about how hyb=
rids have influenced their competitors and industry bodies (e.g., the role =
Maggie’s Organics had in establishing
organic fiber processing standards in the American apparel industry=
rif";color:black">=
6
pan>
ans-serif";color:black">).
We aim to attract papers based on scholarly studies, and invite submission=
s that address (but are not limited to) the following topics and sug=
gested research questions:
pan>
=
=B7
t-size:7.0pt;color:black"> &=
nbsp;
uot;;color:black">Origins and significance of hybrid organizations
b>
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">What explains their growth and popularity?
=3D"color:black">
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">Are they a force or a fad?
>
=
=B7
t-size:7.0pt;color:black"> &=
nbsp;
uot;;color:black">Strategies of and challenges surrounding hybrid organizat=
ions:
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">How are hybrid organizations addressing mission drift, scala=
bility, financing and other known challenges they face?
=3D"color:black">
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing variat=
ions of the LLC form (e.g., L3C, CIC, and Benefit LLC) or variations of cor=
porate form (e.g., Benefit Corporation, flexible purpose
corporation) over their original forms?=
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">How do hybrid organizations compare in purpose, strategies a=
nd models between developing and developed markets?
lor:black">
=
=B7
t-size:7.0pt;color:black"> &=
nbsp;
uot;;color:black">Measurement of social impact and performance:<=
span style=3D"color:black">
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">What impact do hybrid organizations have on their focal issu=
es? Are there differences in impact between industries, markets, regions, e=
tc.?
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">Do hybrid organizations perform better than their traditiona=
l for-profit or non-profit counterparts in terms of social impact and finan=
cial performance?
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">What issues surround the measurement of social impact, and h=
ow are they overcome?<=
/p>
=
=B7
t-size:7.0pt;color:black"> &=
nbsp;
uot;;color:black">Implications of hybrids for management:
tyle=3D"color:black">
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">What implications do hybrid organizations carry for the mana=
gement of traditional for-profit business models?
r:black">
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">What implications do they carry for management in the non-pr=
ofit sector?
<=
span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">
;;color:black">How do traditional companies and non-profits compete with hy=
brid organizations? For example:
">
:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Submission and Dea=
dlines
rmal">
ans-serif";color:black">To submit your manuscript for this special iss=
ue,
please email your paper to
arget=3D"_blank">nardia.haigh@umb.edu
> by 31 October 2013. All papers should meet the content and style g=
uidelines of CMR, which can be found here:
lank">http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidel=
ines.html.<=
/p>
rmal">
ans-serif";color:black">All submissions will be reviewed following CMR=
’s review process. Final decisions about publication will be
made by the CMR editor. For further information, please contact the CMR co=
-guest editor for this special issue, Nardia Haigh:
lor:black">nardia.haigh@umb.edu.
k">
">
:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">References<=
span style=3D"color:black">
&n=
bsp;
rmal">Have a fabulous summer.=
rmal">
;sans-serif";color:black">Nardia
=
=
____=
____________________</spa=
n>
Nardia =
Haigh, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
College of Management
University of Massachuse=
tts Boston
100 Morrissey Boulevard<=
o:p>
Boston, MA 02125
=
Office 215, 5th Floor Mc=
Cormack Building
Ph: +1 (617) 287 773=
1
=
--_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_--
_______________________________________________________________________
To send a message to the list, send your email to SIM@aomlists.pace.edu
_______________________________________________________________________
Visit the SIM Division website at: http://sim.aomonline.org
_______________________________________________________________________
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery
options, you can do so online at: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1