Discussion: View Thread

CMR Special Issue on Hybrid Organizations and Social Entrepreneurship

  • 1.  CMR Special Issue on Hybrid Organizations and Social Entrepreneurship

    Posted 06-01-2013 13:19
    Accept-Language: en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach:
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
    x-originating-ip: [65.120.112.150]
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_"
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Return-Path: Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu
    X-OriginatorOrg: umb.edu

    --_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Friends and colleagues,

    Apologies for cross-postings.

    John Walker, Jill Kickul and I are excited to invite you to submit a paper =
    to a special issue of California Management Review on hybrid organizations =
    and social entrepreneurship. We have pasted the call below, and full inform=
    ation and submission guidelines can be found here: http://cmr.berkeley.edu/=
    submission_guidelines.html#paper_calls.

    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts and Implications
    Guest Editors
    Nardia Haigh (corresponding guest editor), University of Massachusetts, Bos=
    ton, Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu<mailto:Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu>
    John Walker, Echoing Green, New York, John@echoinggreen.org<mailto:John@ech=
    oinggreen.org>
    Jill Kickul, NYU Stern School of Business, New York, jkickul@stern.nyu.edu<=
    mailto:jkickul@stern.nyu.edu>

    With the market for socially and environmentally conscious consumer product=
    s and services growing to almost $300 billion1 and the market for socially =
    responsible investments growing to $3 trillion in assets (or 12% of profess=
    ionally managed funds) in the U.S. alone,2 there has been complementary gro=
    wth in the popularity of hybrid organizations. Hybrid organizations generat=
    e income in ways that are more consistent with a for-profit model, but abid=
    e by substantial social and ecological missions, which have historically be=
    en associated with non-profit models. They have been referred to as Fourth =
    Sector, For-Benefit, Values Driven, Mission Driven, Conscious Capitalism, B=
    -Corporations, and Social Enterprises.3-5 We use the term "hybrid organizat=
    ion" because it reflects the trend of such enterprises to develop business =
    models that are a hybrid of what is traditionally considered for-profit and=
    non-profit, and because they can exist on either side of the for-profit/no=
    n-profit divide (or both sides).6

    The growth in the number and impact of hybrid organizations also complement=
    s the introduction of new business registration categories that protect exe=
    cutives and management from shareholder action demanding that profit be max=
    imized and prioritized over mission. In the U.S. alone these categories inc=
    lude L3C (Low-profit Limited Liability Company), Benefit LLC, Benefit Corpo=
    ration, and Flexible Purpose Corporation. At the time of writing, twelve U.=
    S. states had enacted such legislation, and it was proposed in a further fo=
    urteen.7 The certification body B-Lab is a key protagonist in this movement=
    , as is The American Sustainable Business Council. Since 2008, B-Lab has ce=
    rtified 693 "B Corporations," collectively generating $4.2 billion in annua=
    l revenue, and operating throughout 60 industries in 24 countries.7 The gro=
    wth in hybrid organizations makes them of interest to more traditional for-=
    profit companies because they have become competitors and acquisition targe=
    ts.8 Hybrids also compete with traditional non-profit organizations, since =
    in many cases they can source funding and support from the same foundations=
    and agencies, and occupy similar places in the mind of the donating public=
    .

    Hybrid business models have been termed "sustainability-driven,"6 because t=
    heir business models are designed around the alleviation of a particular se=
    t of social and/or environmental issues.9 However, they also face significa=
    nt challenges surrounding the choice of legal structure, measurement of imp=
    act, funding, and scaling up operations.10 Valid questions have also been r=
    aised about the sustainability of their models and missions, since there ar=
    e examples where hybrids have folded or drifted away from their mission eit=
    her through acquisition, leadership changes, or fierce competition from mai=
    nstream businesses that maximize profits.5 Other questions inquire about de=
    gree to which operating a for-profit business with embedded consciousness c=
    ould ever be widely applied or achieve the sustained societal and environme=
    ntal transformation for which they strive.5


    The goal of this special issue is to stimulate authors to consider the rise=
    of hybrid organizations, the ways in which they create and track the share=
    d value to which they aspire, and the degree to which these models are sust=
    ainable over the long-term. Perhaps more significantly, we aim to offer val=
    uable content focusing on the implications (positive and negative) of hybri=
    d models for the management of traditional businesses and hence CMR's audie=
    nce. To date, only anecdotal evidence has been presented about how hybrids =
    have influenced their competitors and industry bodies (e.g., the role Maggi=
    e's Organics had in establishing organic fiber processing standards in the =
    American apparel industry6). We aim to attract papers based on scholarly st=
    udies, and invite submissions that address (but are not limited to) the fol=
    lowing topics and suggested research questions:

    * Origins and significance of hybrid organizations

    o What explains their growth and popularity?

    o Are they a force or a fad?

    * Strategies of and challenges surrounding hybrid organizations:

    o How are hybrid organizations addressing mission drift, scalability, fin=
    ancing and other known challenges they face?

    o What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing variations of the=
    LLC form (e.g., L3C, CIC, and Benefit LLC) or variations of corporate form=
    (e.g., Benefit Corporation, flexible purpose corporation) over their origi=
    nal forms?

    o How do hybrid organizations compare in purpose, strategies and models b=
    etween developing and developed markets?

    * Measurement of social impact and performance:

    o What impact do hybrid organizations have on their focal issues? Are the=
    re differences in impact between industries, markets, regions, etc.?

    o Do hybrid organizations perform better than their traditional for-profi=
    t or non-profit counterparts in terms of social impact and financial perfor=
    mance?

    o What issues surround the measurement of social impact, and how are they=
    overcome?

    * Implications of hybrids for management:

    o What implications do hybrid organizations carry for the management of t=
    raditional for-profit business models?

    o What implications do they carry for management in the non-profit sector=
    ?

    o How do traditional companies and non-profits compete with hybrid organi=
    zations? For example:

    * Are hybrids perceived as a force or a fad?

    * To what degree (if any) are traditional companies and non-profits alteri=
    ng their strategies or even their models to compete with hybrid organizatio=
    ns?


    Submission and Deadlines

    To submit your manuscript for this special issue, please email your paper t=
    o nardia.haigh@umb.edu<mailto:nardia.haigh@umb.edu> by 31 October 2013. All=
    papers should meet the content and style guidelines of CMR, which can be f=
    ound here: http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidelines.html.

    All submissions will be reviewed following CMR's review process. Final deci=
    sions about publication will be made by the CMR editor. For further informa=
    tion, please contact the CMR co-guest editor for this special issue, Nardia=
    Haigh: nardia.haigh@umb.edu<mailto:nardia.haigh@umb.edu>.


    References
    1. LOHAS. 2011. Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability. http://www.lohas.=
    com/about, accessed 29 July 2011.
    2. USSIF. 2010. Report: Socially Responsible Investing Assets in US Top $3 =
    Trillion; Nearly 1 Out of Every 8 Dollars Under Professional Management. h=
    ttp://ussif.org/news/releases/pressrelease.cfm?id=3D168, accessed 12 August=
    2011.
    3. Alter, K. 2004. Social Enterprise Typology. Seattle, WA: Virtue Ventures=
    LLC.
    4. Boyd, B., et al. 2009. Hybrid Organizations: New Business Models for Env=
    ironmental Leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
    5. O'Toole, J. and D. Vogel. 2011. Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capi=
    talism, California Management Review, 53/3: 60-76.
    6. Hoffman, A.J., K.K. Badiane, and N. Haigh. 2012. Hybrid Organizations as=
    Agents of Positive Social Change: Bridging the For-Profit & Non-Profit Div=
    ide, in Using a Positive Lens to Explore Social Change and Organizations: B=
    uilding a Theoretical and Research Foundation, K. Golden-Biddle and J. Dutt=
    on, Editors, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
    7. B-Lab. 2012. Annual Report and website. http://bcorporation.net/, acces=
    sed 3 July 2012.
    8. Haigh, N. and A.J. Hoffman. 2012. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter=
    of sustainable business, Organizational Dynamics, 41: 126-134.
    9. Nielsen, C. and P.M. Samia. 2008. Understanding key factors in social en=
    terprise development of the BOP: a systems approach applied to case studies=
    in the Philippines, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25/7: 446-454.
    10. Battilana, J., et al. 2012. In Search of the Hybrid Ideal, in Stanford =
    Social Innovation Review: Stanford, United States, Stanford. p. 51-55.


    Have a fabulous summer.

    Nardia


    ________________________
    Nardia Haigh, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor
    College of Management
    University of Massachusetts Boston
    100 Morrissey Boulevard
    Boston, MA 02125

    Office 215, 5th Floor McCormack Building
    Ph: +1 (617) 287 7731


    --_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
    xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
    //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

    1">





    Friends and colleagues,<=
    o:p>


    =


    Apologies for cross-post=
    ings.


     =


    John Walker, Jill Kickul=
    and I are excited to invite you to submit a paper to a special issue of Ca=
    lifornia Management Review on hybrid organizations and social entrepreneurs=
    hip. We have pasted the call below,
    and full information and submission guidelines can be found here: =3D"http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidelines.html#paper_calls" target=
    =3D"_blank">
    http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidelines.h=
    tml#paper_calls
    .


     =


    olor:black">CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW=


    olor:black">CALL FOR PAPERS span>


    <spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Str=
    ategies, Impacts and Implications


    Guest Editors<=
    /u>


    lack">Nardia Haigh (corresponding gu=
    est editor), University of Massachusetts, Boston,
    lor:black">Nardia.Haigh@umb.edu


    lack">John Walker, Echoing Green, Ne=
    w York,
    olor:black">John@echoinggreen.org


    lack">Jill Kickul, NYU Stern School =
    of Business, New York,
    olor:black">jkickul@stern.nyu.edu


    k"> 


    With the market for soci=
    ally and environmentally conscious consumer products and services growing t=
    o almost $300 billion >1
    and the market for socially responsible investments growing to $3 trillion=
    in assets (or 12% of professionally managed funds) in the U.S. alone, ef=3D"#_ENREF_2" title=3D"USSIF, 2010 #2753"> k;text-decoration:none">2
    there has been complementary growth in the popularity of hybrid organizati=
    ons. Hybrid organizations generate income in ways that are more consistent =
    with a for-profit model, but abide by substantial social and ecological mis=
    sions, which have historically been
    associated with non-profit models. They have been referred to as Fourth Se=
    ctor, For-Benefit, Values Driven, Mission Driven, Conscious Capitalism, B-C=
    orporations, and Social Enterprises. 004 #2499">3-5=

    We use the term “hybrid organization” because it reflects the =
    trend of such enterprises to develop business models that are a hybrid of w=
    hat is traditionally considered for-profit and non-profit, and because they=
    can exist on either side of the for-profit/non-profit
    divide (or both sides). >6


     =


    The growth in the number=
    and impact of hybrid organizations also complements the introduction of ne=
    w business registration categories that protect executives and management f=
    rom shareholder action demanding that
    profit be maximized and prioritized over mission. In the U.S. alone these =
    categories include L3C (Low-profit Limited Liability Company), Benefit LLC,=
    Benefit Corporation, and Flexible Purpose Corporation. At the time of writ=
    ing, twelve U.S. states had enacted
    such legislation, and it was proposed in a further fourteen. NREF_7" title=3D"B-Lab, 2012 #2749"> coration:none">7 The certification body B-Lab is a key pro=
    tagonist in this movement, as is The American
    Sustainable Business Council. Since 2008, B-Lab has certified 693 “B=
    Corporations,” collectively generating $4.2 billion in annual revenu=
    e, and operating throughout 60 industries in 24 countries. F_7" title=3D"B-Lab, 2012 #2749"> ation:none">7
    The growth in hybrid organizations makes them of interest to more traditio=
    nal for-profit companies because they have become competitors and acquisiti=
    on targets. le=3D"color:black;text-decoration:none">8
    Hybrids also compete with traditional non-profit organizations, since in m=
    any cases they can source funding and support from the same foundations and=
    agencies, and occupy similar places in the mind of the donating public.


     =


    Hybrid business models h=
    ave been termed “sustainability-driven,” itle=3D"Hoffman, 2012 #2597"> n:none">6 because their business models
    are designed around the alleviation of a particular set of social and/or e=
    nvironmental issues.<su=
    p>9
    Howev=
    er, they also face significant challenges
    surrounding the choice of legal structure, measurement of impact, funding,=
    and scaling up operations. #3030">10 > Valid questions have also been raised
    about the sustainability of their models and missions, since there are exa=
    mples where hybrids have folded or drifted away from their mission either t=
    hrough acquisition, leadership changes, or fierce competition from mainstre=
    am businesses that maximize profits. 2011 #3029">5=

    Other questions inquire about degree to which operating a for-profit busin=
    ess with embedded consciousness could ever be widely applied or achieve the=
    sustained societal and environmental transformation for which they strive.=
    or:black;text-decoration:none">5


     =


    rmal"> ;color:black">The goal of this special issue is to stimulate authors to con=
    sider the rise of hybrid organizations, the ways in which
    they create and track the shared value to which they aspire, and the degre=
    e to which these models are sustainable over the long-term. Perhaps more si=
    gnificantly, we aim to offer valuable content focusing on the implications =
    (positive and negative) of hybrid
    models for the management of traditional businesses and hence CMR’s =
    audience. To date, only anecdotal evidence has been presented about how hyb=
    rids have influenced their competitors and industry bodies (e.g., the role =
    Maggie’s Organics had in establishing
    organic fiber processing standards in the American apparel industry
    =
    rif";color:black">=
    6 pan>
    ans-serif";color:black">).
    We aim to attract papers based on scholarly studies, and invite submission=
    s that address (but are not limited to) the following topics and sug=
    gested research questions:
    pan>


    =
    =B7 t-size:7.0pt;color:black">        &=
    nbsp;  
    uot;;color:black">Origins and significance of hybrid organizations b>


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">What explains their growth and popularity? =3D"color:black">


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">Are they a force or a fad? >


    =
    =B7 t-size:7.0pt;color:black">        &=
    nbsp;  
    uot;;color:black">Strategies of and challenges surrounding hybrid organizat=
    ions:


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">How are hybrid organizations addressing mission drift, scala=
    bility, financing and other known challenges they face?
    =3D"color:black">


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing variat=
    ions of the LLC form (e.g., L3C, CIC, and Benefit LLC) or variations of cor=
    porate form (e.g., Benefit Corporation, flexible purpose
    corporation) over their original forms?
    =


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">How do hybrid organizations compare in purpose, strategies a=
    nd models between developing and developed markets?
    lor:black">


    =
    =B7 t-size:7.0pt;color:black">        &=
    nbsp;  
    uot;;color:black">Measurement of social impact and performance:<=
    span style=3D"color:black">


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">What impact do hybrid organizations have on their focal issu=
    es? Are there differences in impact between industries, markets, regions, e=
    tc.?


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">Do hybrid organizations perform better than their traditiona=
    l for-profit or non-profit counterparts in terms of social impact and finan=
    cial performance?


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">What issues surround the measurement of social impact, and h=
    ow are they overcome?
    <=
    /p>

    =
    =B7 t-size:7.0pt;color:black">        &=
    nbsp;  
    uot;;color:black">Implications of hybrids for management: tyle=3D"color:black">


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">What implications do hybrid organizations carry for the mana=
    gement of traditional for-profit business models?
    r:black">


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">What implications do they carry for management in the non-pr=
    ofit sector?


    <=
    span style=3D"font-family:"Courier New";color:black">o<spa=
    n style=3D"font-size:7.0pt;color:black">  
    ;;color:black">How do traditional companies and non-profits compete with hy=
    brid organizations? For example:




    "> 


    :"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Submission and Dea=
    dlines


    rmal"> ans-serif";color:black">To submit your manuscript for this special iss=
    ue,
    please email your paper to arget=3D"_blank">nardia.haigh@umb.edu
    > by 31 October 2013. All papers should meet the content and style g=
    uidelines of CMR, which can be found here:
    lank">http://cmr.berkeley.edu/submission_guidel=
    ines.html
    .<=
    /p>

    rmal"> ans-serif";color:black">All submissions will be reviewed following CMR=
    ’s review process. Final decisions about publication will be
    made by the CMR editor. For further information, please contact the CMR co=
    -guest editor for this special issue, Nardia Haigh:
    lor:black">nardia.haigh@umb.edu
    . k">


    "> 


    :"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">References<=
    span style=3D"color:black">


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">1. LOHAS. =
    2011. Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability. 
    t" target=3D"_blank"> bri","sans-serif";color:black">http://www.lohas.com/about pan> ot;,"sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">,
    accessed 29 July 2011.
    >


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">2. USSIF. =
    2010. Report: Socially Responsible Investing Assets in US Top $3 Trillion; =
    Nearly 1 Out of Every 8 Dollars Under Professional Management. 
    eases/pressrelease.cfm?id=3D168" target=3D"_blank"> :12.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"=
    >http://ussif.org/news/releases/pressrelease.cfm?id=3D168
    =
    serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">,
    accessed 12 August 2011.
    </sp=
    an>


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">3. Alter, =
    K. 2004.
    Social Enterprise Typology. Seattle, WA: Virtue Ventures LLC.
    =


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">4. Boyd, B=
    ., et al. 2009.
    Hybrid Organizations: New Business Models for Environmental Leadership i>. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
    =


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">5. O'Toole=
    , J. and D. Vogel. 2011. Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capitalism,=

    California Management Review, 53/3: 60-76.
    color:black">


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">6. Hoffman=
    , A.J., K.K. Badiane, and N. Haigh. 2012. Hybrid Organizations as Agents of=
    Positive Social Change: Bridging the For-Profit & Non-Profit
    Divide, in Using a Positive Lens to Explore Social Change and Organizat=
    ions: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation
    , K. Golden-Biddle =
    and J. Dutton, Editors, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
    <spa=
    n style=3D"color:black">


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">7. B-Lab. =
    2012. Annual Report and website. 
    target=3D"_blank"> i","sans-serif";color:black">http://bcorporation.net/=
    "sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">,
    accessed 3 July 2012.
    =


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">8. Haigh, =
    N. and A.J. Hoffman. 2012. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustai=
    nable business,
    Organizational Dynamics, 41: 126-134.
    :black">


    n-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:left;text-indent:-.5in">
    bri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">9. Nielsen=
    , C. and P.M. Samia. 2008. Understanding key factors in social enterprise d=
    evelopment of the BOP: a systems approach applied to case
    studies in the Philippines, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2=
    5/7: 446-454.


    5in"> t;Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;font-weight:normal">10. =
    Battilana, J., et al. 2012. In Search of the Hybrid Ideal, in
    Stanford Social Innovation Review: Stanford, United States, Stanford=
    . p. 51-55.


    &n=
    bsp;


    rmal">Have a fabulous summer.=


    rmal"> ;sans-serif";color:black">Nardia


     =


     =


    ____=
    ____________________
    </spa=
    n>


    Nardia =
    Haigh, Ph.D.


    Assistant Professor


    College of Management


    University of Massachuse=
    tts Boston


    100 Morrissey Boulevard<=
    o:p>


    Boston, MA 02125


     =


    Office 215, 5th Floor Mc=
    Cormack Building


    Ph: +1 (617) 287 773=
    1


     =






    --_000_FA69C208EA10A34D96FD1F420CAE8F4B01A3D7C5BY2PRD0111MB496_--

    _______________________________________________________________________

    To send a message to the list, send your email to SIM@aomlists.pace.edu

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Visit the SIM Division website at: http://sim.aomonline.org
    _______________________________________________________________________

    If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery
    options, you can do so online at: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1