Hello all:
As I am sure everyone on this list serve is aware there has been a great
deal of discussion and debate about the new AACSB accreditation
standards (see below) which do not require specific coursework in the
area of ethics/social issues in management. However the "Assurance of
Learning Standards" used in the accreditation process do require
documentation of student learning in the area of "Ethical understanding
and reasoning abilities."
I am not looking to reopen the debate about whether there should be a
requirement for specific coursework in the field (I think there should
be). However, because Virginia Tech is among the first schools
undergoing reaccreditation with these standards, I am trying to figure
out how to define and then measure "Ethical understanding and reasoning
abilities." These seem to be a very important issues that many of us
will be facing and that will have important implications for the field.
After an initial brainstorming with a colleague, Kevin Carlson, we came
up with 3 components of this that would be potentially measureable by
evaluation of case analyses done by students and testing of knowledge of
key ethics terminology:
1. The capacity to identify ethical implications of situations
2. The capacity to reason through the ethical implications of
situations
3. The capacity, given a problem with ethical implications, to
articulate a course of action and provide the ethical
justifications for the chosen course of action.
I was wondering if anyone else out there is preparing for
reaccreditation and is grappling with these same questions. Also, I
would welcome feedback as to whether or not these seem like the
reasonable components of "Ethical understanding and reasoning
abilities."
People may respond to me individually or over the list serve as you deem
appropriate.
AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards follow.
THE ASSURANCE OF LEARNING STANDARDS
15: Management of Curricula: The school uses well documented, systematic
processes to develop, monitor, evaluate, and revise the substance and
delivery of the curricula of degree programs and to assess the impact of
the curricula on learning. Curriculum management includes inputs from
all appropriate constituencies which may include faculty, staff,
administrators, students, faculty from non-business disciplines, alumni,
and the business community served by the school.
The standard requires use of a systematic process for curriculum
management but does not require any specific courses in the curriculum.
Normally, the curriculum management process will result in an
undergraduate degree program that includes learning experiences in such
general knowledge and skill areas as:
* Communication abilities.
* Ethical understanding and reasoning abilities.
* Analytic skills.
* Use of information technology.
* Multicultural and diversity understanding.
* Reflective thinking skills.
Thanks, Rich
Richard E. Wokutch
Pamplin Professor and Head
Department of Management
Pamplin College of Business
2007 Pamplin Hall
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24061 (0233)
ph: (540) 231-6353
fax: (540) 231-3076
_______________________________________________________________________
To send a message to the list, send your email to
SIM@aomlists.pace.edu
_______________________________________________________________________
Visit the SIM Division website at:
http://sim.aomonline.org
_______________________________________________________________________
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list or change your delivery
options, you can do so online at:
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=sim&A=1