List of Contributions

Contact Details

Seattle University

Ribbons

Badges

John Dienhart

Seattle University

Contributions

1 to 5 of 11 total
Posted By John Dienhart 06-26-2014 11:11
Found In Egroup: Social Issues in Management SIM
\ view thread
With the usual apologies for cross-posting. Position Description: Frank Shrontz Chair for Professional Ethics Seattle University's Albers School of Business and Economics invites applications for the Frank Shrontz Chair for Professional Ethics to begin Fall, 2015. The purpose of the Shrontz Chair ...
Posted By John Dienhart 07-02-2013 09:52
Found In Egroup: Social Issues in Management SIM
\ view thread
Hello everyone, we are seeking applicants for an assistant professor in strategy in the Department of Management in the Albers School of Business and Economics at Seattle University. Seattle University and Albers strongly support the scholar teacher model. We reward both. In my 14 years at Seattle University ...
Posted By John Dienhart 04-30-2012 14:25
Found In Egroup: Social Issues in Management SIM
\ view thread
Last week I sent out a message asking how people on this listserv used statistics or other kind of data to teach business ethics. The attachment summarizes the responses I received. Thanks to all of those who responded. Best regards, John This e-mail was written using voice recognition ...
Posted By John Dienhart 04-22-2012 14:17
Found In Egroup: Social Issues in Management SIM
\ view thread
Sorry for cross-posting. Hello all, I sometimes use stats and other data in my bus eth classes, such as the Ethics Resource Center's National Business Ethics Survey (http://ethics.org/nbes/). I am wondering what kind of stats or data others use in their classes and how they use it. Please reply to ...
Posted By John Dienhart 12-20-2009 16:34
Found In Egroup: Social Issues in Management SIM
\ view thread
Jean, great point. The only thing I would add is that that who bear the risk should be informed and can refuse the risk if they so desire. I am not sure those producing the product should impose their view of what acceptable risk is. This is the responsibility of users of the product. A wrinkle here ...